Wimbledon 2011: Random Thoughts

I'm in northern Europe at the moment and the weather here is dreadful. As I write this note, it's sunny and pouring rain. If the next couple of weeks are anything like the last two weeks, Roger is going to need very good scheduling help. Roger and Team should try and hold the tournament to its center court schedule. There will be pressure from those who suffer from delays on the outer courts to get on center court. This is where Paul Annacone's relationship with the AELTC comes into play.

Sampras Analyses The Top Four's Chances

The Wimbledon draw is out but before discussing that it’s worth checking out what my main man, Pete, had to say about the chances of the top 4 at this year’s tournament.

It’s worth noting that Pete’s comments in general since his retirement about the state of the game have largely mirrored the views of the creators of this blog, apart from his initial, and what many would describe as a “sore” reaction to Roger Federer’s dominance in the game. It was his view early on that Roger dominated in an era that was relatively weaker than his, in that while everyone was fitter, stronger and faster, and generally excellent tennis players, very few were actual champions. One could provide counter arguments such as the fact that even in his era, his period of domination by and large coincided with the decline of the champions of his time. Edberg was on his way out and even beat Sampras in a heartbreaking loss at the 1992 US Open before Sampras began his domination. Courier did not win another major after Sampras won his second, owning four (two Australian, two French) until then. Boris Becker too, struggled to hit the form he maintained through the late 80s and early 90s. Michael Chang never won a major after his first French.

His one competitor, Andre Agassi, was extremely inconsistent in terms of true dominance, and injuries mixed with an internal struggle to try and explain to himself what exactly the game should mean to him put the brakes on what could have been a rivalry as classic as Federer-Nadal.

But a lot of Sampras’ recent comments have struck a chord with us, on how players today are less capable at really going after points and more interested in staying in them (paraphrasing). Tennis today is becoming more and more about being able to run down balls, decreasing pure tennis “skill” levels but increasing levels of endurance to previously impossible proportions. And unfortunately, more and more, the ability to do the latter is being equated with real championship material and excellent tennis, as opposed to being able to take initiative early. A million other factors are responsible for this, such as an apparent decrease in court speeds and the much talked about changes in racquet technology, which only cements it in the minds of up and coming players and coaches that innate skills are not enough and they have to reach an almost insane level of fitness to stay in the top 10. Gone are the days when a break of serve at the end of a set on grass was the mark of a champion.


As a grass court player, Sampras’ approach to an opponent’s return game was vastly different from Federer’s. Sampras would take huge cuts on the return, having complete faith in his own serve, which either worked in that he’d get a single break a set, or it went to a TB where Sampras’s second serve was unparalleled.  Federer, on the other hand, being more of an aggressive baseliner than a serve and volleyer or a chip ‘n charger, grinds out service games waiting for mistakes, getting many break point opportunities until he breaks through. And it worked well for him until he met a certain Spanish southpaw who refused to allow him to convert them since the serve constantly moved away from him either too low or too high in the direction of his backhand, adding increased pressure on Federer’s service games.

It is with this in mind that I hope Federer approaches Wimbledon this year. While nobody expects him to go ballistic on return games, perhaps a little more faith in his own ability and feel on this surface would serve him well, unlike his finals against Nadal in ’07 and ’08, or even against Roddick in ’09, where it took an imperial serving performance to get his 15^th major. This is Roger’s first Wimbledon with Annacone (who coached Pete through the majority of those Wimbledon titles) on his side, and we expect him to, if not literally follow in his footsteps, at least take a leaf out of the Sampras book on returning on grass. Roger’s approach to the clay at Roland Garros, where he hardly hit the same ball twice in a rally, should give Federer fans plenty of encouragement in terms of their hero’s chances. That and a good first serve percentage should see him through to the title, whoever he meets in the final.

With all that said, Pete’s comments on the top four players at SW19:

ON FEDERER

 "When Wimbledon comes around, you have to put Roger as the man to beat on that surface. He played extremely well in the French Open final and lost to one of the greats of all time on clay. I see him oozing with confidence.

"I see different things, especially in the final of the French, that Roger is trying to do -- be a little more aggressive, take the ball earlier, which is obviously tougher to do against Rafa on clay. And I like what I see. He wants to improve, and he still enjoys it. I think Paul has helped him with the mental side, just talking about strategy. Paul knows what it's like, he knows what a great player goes through, and it's really helped Roger in my mind."

ON NADAL

"Whenever Wimbledon comes around and you look at Rafa's game, you might find him a little bit vulnerable. But year in, year out, he comes out with great results. He beats the guys he should, and before you know it, he's in the second week playing great. He saw what he had to do a couple of years back to play well at Wimbledon, and he's improved those areas.

"He's a machine. He feels he has to put in the time ahead of Wimbledon, and I respect that, but there's a part of you that has to give the mind and body a break. It might be a blessing in disguise he went down early [at Queen's], just to regroup and enjoy Paris a little bit. He's just one of those athletes that come once every 25 years. He keeps going and going. I hope that Rafa, as he gets older, is aware of his schedule and body. That's the only thing that can hold him back."

ON DJOKOVIC

"It's incredible what he's been able to do, be so consistent. Mentally he's figured it out, really shown great improvement. I think now he has an aura about him. He's turned into a great player.

"If you look at the history of the game, when I broke through and started to dominate, and Roger, we were about 23. Novak won that early major in 2008; it takes you a few years to figure out how you need to play, who you're playing against and to be really comfortable in your own skin, and I think Novak has turned the corner. With his game and athletic ability, I'm not surprised he's right there. When you break down his game, he doesn't have any holes."

ON COMPARISONS BETWEEN DJOKOVIC AND AGASSI AS RETURNERS

"It's hard to say who has a better return because pretty much the style of play is one-dimensional today. When I was playing, you had a lot of different looks. If he was up against a Goran [Ivanisevic], [Stefan] Edberg or [Boris] Becker consistently, you could really get a sense of how well he returns.

"But he's a great returner and will continue to be. I look at his percentage of breaking, and it's something ridiculous. I think it's the best in the world."

ON MURRAY

"I look at him as one of the favorites, but maybe not quite the same as the other guys. On a given day, if he plays well and gets the crowd support, he could very well have some destiny on his side.

"He's dealing with a lot more than the other guys, in terms of the pressure of the country and the media on every move and on everything he says. It's tough enough playing these guys, then you add all that. It's nothing that any other player has experienced. Maybe Becker, but he didn't have a major in Germany. Even in my generation with Tim [Henman], he talked to the press every day; it's like an ongoing thing in the back of his head. I hope Andy can shut that noise out and play his tennis.

"I do see him get agitated sometimes. Every now and again, you see him yelling at his box. He's an emotional guy, and that's what makes him tough -- he's in every point. But you'd like to see him recover a bit quicker and potentially chill, into something more positive. He's a little temperamental, which is fine. It's just that in this sport, you have to have a short memory. You play a bad point, you move on."

You can find Pete’s comments at the link below:

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/wimbledon11/columns/story?columnist=ubha_ravi&id=6671956

WSJ: Federer's Best Shot

Nearing 30, dogged by two younger phenoms, he heads to Wimbledon without a win in the last five majors. Is he winding down? Unlikely. How Roger does it.

Roger Federer shouldn't look this good.

He has played 959 professional matches in his career, appeared in 46 consecutive Grand Slam tournaments and spent more than a decade criss-crossing time zones while collecting a record 16 major singles titles and more than $60 million in prize money. Married and the father of twin 22-month-old girls, Mr. Federer brings his family—jet lag, runny noses and all—on the road with him from Melbourne to Paris to London to New York, and many places in between.

Where in the World is Roger Federer?

Between June 2010 and June 2011, Roger Federer flew over 73,000 miles. Click on the map to track his travels from city to city.

View Interactive

Long Toss: Roger Federer

• Interview: Roger Federer spoke to The Wall Street Journal about his health, his future, fatherhood and Wimbledon, his favorite tournament.

All of this for a man who in August will turn 30, the beginning of the twilight years in modern competitive tennis.

Yet as the 125th edition of Wimbledon is set to begin next week, Mr. Federer is fresh, fit, confident and, remarkably, on the upswing after a stellar performance at the French Open, where he ended 24-year-old Novak Djokovic's 43-match winning streak and pushed Rafael Nadal, age 25 and perhaps the best clay court player in history, to four sets in the final.

"I'm in a very good place mentally and physically," he said. "I still feel very young."

As Mr. Djokovic piled up victories this season, beating Messrs. Federer and Nadal a total of seven times, it was tempting to leave Mr. Federer out of the Grand Slam conversation. His last major title came at the 2010 Australian Open and Mr. Nadal dominated the rest of the season, winning at Roland Garros, Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. But in Paris earlier this month against Mr. Djokovic, Mr. Federer either turned back the clock, or showed that in Federer years, the seconds tick away much more slowly than anyone had anticipated.

At Wimbledon, he'll engage in what promises to be a remarkable power struggle. Mr. Nadal hasn't lost at Wimbledon since the 2007 final. Mr. Djokovic badly wants to rebound from his first defeat of the year. Behind them lurks Andy Murray, 24, who won a grass-court event in London this week and is always a threat. As for Mr. Federer, no surface rewards his attacking style as richly as the lawns of Wimbledon, where he has won six titles, one fewer than Pete Sampras. He called Wimbledon the "holy grail" of the sport and his primary goal each year.

View Full Image

European Pressphoto Agency

How Federer Can Beat Nadal: Serve, serve, serve -- 65% or better on the first serve ought to do it. Be sneaky: Nadal likes to be in rhythm, so change the pace of rallies and finish points at the net to keep him off balance.

View Full Image

Reuters

To Beat Djokovic: Get ahead: Djokovic isn't as confident against Federer as Nadal. Wide slice serves, which worked in Paris, could be even better on grass. Mind games: Djokovic has never won a semi at Wimbledon.

Mr. Federer, whose first major title came at Wimbledon in 2003, said his favorite childhood tennis memories were watching Stefan Edberg and Boris Becker contest three straight Wimbledon finals from 1988 to 1990.

"Just practicing at Wimbledon, being a member, putting all the whites on with the ivy on the walls, the purple and green, it's something that really touches me," he said. "It's such a sacred place in tennis."

Everyone knows about Mr. Federer's titles, his graceful technique and his boundless skills: a precise serve, a lightning forehand, deft touch and impeccable footwork. The most remarkable part of the Federer story, though, has been his uncanny ability to fend off physical and emotional fatigue and remain motivated.

Tennis history is littered with great players who succumbed to injuries or burnout. Björn Borg played his last Grand Slam tournament at age 25. John McEnroe didn't win a major title after age 25. In Paris this year, Mr. Nadal celebrated his 25th birthday—and remarked, as he struggled in early rounds, that he felt like he had been "playing for 100 years" on the pro tour. In the Open era, which began in 1968, late-career success has been rare. Only 10 men age 30 or older have won major titles, the last being Andre Agassi at the 2003 Australian Open when he was 32.

On paper, Mr. Federer has had a punishing career. Yet in all his years, he has had few significant setbacks: an ankle injury in 2005, mononucleosis in 2008 and more recently, lower back pain. He has retired from a match exactly once in his life, when he was a 16-year-old playing a junior tournament in Belgium. His immunity from injury is unparalleled.

What's Old, In Tennis Years

The ages of five legends when they won their last Grand Slam tournaments

Pete Sampras, 31
Won U.S. Open in 2002

Rod Laver, age 31
Won U.S. Open in 1969

Björn Borg, 25
Won French Open in 1981

Jimmy Connors, 31
Won U.S. Open in 1983

John McEnroe, 25
Won U.S. Open in 1984

"If I didn't know better, I would say I don't believe it," said Mr. Agassi, who climbed back to the top of the sport in his 30s, but did it after a rejuvenating break from the game. "But I've seen him do it for too long now. You can't bluff your way through it."

Mr. Federer attributes some of his resilience to a love for travel, something that his wife, Mirka, also shares. Many tennis players come to see globetrotting as soul-crushing and do little more than shuttle back and forth between their hotel rooms and the tennis courts. Mr. Federer is more inclined to soak up the local culture: When he went to Shanghai last year, he took Mandarin lessons and spent a day at the World Expo.

"The tour is not supposed to be brutal and annoying," he said.

He said his twin daughters, Charlene and Myla, who will turn two late next month, haven't lessened his desire to win or train. He and the family travel by private jet and his parents and babysitters help with the kids.

Another asset when traveling with family: Unlike many professional athletes, Mr. Federer is not superstitious. "It doesn't need to be the same every day, doesn't need to be the same shower I use, the same restaurant I go to, the same hour I go to sleep," he said. "I've always been very flexible. I don't care if I practice at nine in the morning or 10 p.m."

ATP Tour

Roger Federer

How to Be Like Roger

He hardly ever gets hurt. He's almost never tired or grumpy. What's the secret?

Think long-term, don't overplay:
"I tried to look at the long-term. I didn't want to chase everything possible in the short term."

No sports superstitions:
"I don't care if I practice at 9 in the morning or 10 p.m."

Pay attention to your body:
"He's able to say, it doesn't hurt me today, but it could hurt me tomorrow."

Travel can be fun—enjoy it:
"The tour is not supposed to be brutal and annoying."

Take two- to four-week training periods for:

1) Rest and recovery

2) Strength and endurance (not tennis-related)

3) Tennis exercise like court footwork (but with medicine balls, not rackets and balls)

4) Tennis practice

Mr. Federer has been planning his attack on time—to not just be great, but to do it for longer than anyone else has done it—since he first became No. 1 in 2004. He recalled a conversation he had with his long-time physical trainer, Pierre Paganini, as he closed in on the top of the game.

"I was at a crossroads to decide, 'Am I happy with winning two Slams, one World Tour final, world No. 1? Will that suffice for me, or do I want to achieve more?' " he said. "I remember a very strong conversation with Pierre, we always said, 'If I do hit world No. 1, I won't overplay,' because I tried to look at the long term. I didn't want to just chase everything possible in the short term."

Each year, Messrs. Federer and Paganini block out at least three two- to four-week training periods (usually one each in December, February and July, and sometimes another in the fall). Mr. Paganini said there are four components to each session: rest and recovery, meaning, take time off and start training slowly; strength and endurance exercises not specific to tennis; tennis-centered exercises, such as footwork patterns on a court, but while using medicine balls, not rackets and tennis balls; and tennis practice. Many of these sessions have taken place in the Dubai heat, though Mr. Federer trains there less often since he became a father. He also stretches several times a day.

In the last two years, Mr. Federer has put extra emphasis on his abdominal muscles in response to back pain that lingered long enough, he said, to cost him several training sessions (he cited the injury at Wimbledon last year, when he lost in the quarterfinals).

"After doing it for over one and a half, two years now, it's paying off," he said. "If the back is going to stay this way for the rest of my career, I'll be very happy."

Mr. Paganini, a chiseled 53-year-old, looks like he works out as often as an average person drinks water. He has known Mr. Federer since Mr. Federer was a 14-year-old prize talent in the Swiss Tennis Federation, where Mr. Paganini worked as a trainer in the junior program. He has been Mr. Federer's personal trainer since 2000. He described Mr. Federer as a rare combination of creative and disciplined.

"Usually, when you're an artist, you have not so much structure," Mr. Paganini said. "And when you're a hard worker who is maybe less of an artist, then you're very organized. He is able to do both. Roger is a champ because he's the boss of his talent."

Mr. Paganini says there are two essential elements of Mr. Federer's longevity. First, he still trains with the enthusiasm of a junior. "Sometimes I think, 'Damn it, he's doing these exercises now 2,756 times, but he does it as if it was the first time," Mr. Paganini said.

Grand Slam Lit

Tennis may not be baseball, boxing or golf when it comes to flights of poetry and prose, but great writing has still been served up over the years. Some favorites:

'Levels of the Game'
John McPhee

Mr. McPhee masterfully uses the 1968 U.S. Open semifinal match between Arthur Ashe and Clark Graebner to explore the intricacies of human character and culture.

* * *

'The Inner Game of Tennis'
W. Timothy Gallwey

The classic that gave tennis players—and many others—belief that they could train their minds, in a Zen-like way, for success.

* * *

'Open'
Andre Agassi

The man who hated tennis and later learned to love it tells all, from the ball machine that shaped his childhood (he called it "the dragon") to drugs to winning every major title in the game.

* * *

'Winning Ugly'
Brad Gilbert

How ugly was Brad Gilbert's game? "You are the worst," John McEnroe once told him during a match. And yes, Mr. Gilbert won. A primer in court strategy.

* * *

'You Cannot Be Serious'
John McEnroe and James Kaplan

One of the most distinctive players in the history of the game looks back on his career and a sometimes-turbulent off-court life.

* * *

'The Tennis Partner'
Abraham Verghese
(Author of 'Cutting for Stone')

A compelling novel that received far-reaching praise, from tennis fans to literary critics to the Journal of American Medicine.

Mr. Federer also has an uncanny feel for his own health. "He's able to say, it doesn't hurt me today, but it could hurt me tomorrow," Mr. Paganini said. "And he doesn't say this just to have less work to do. He knows that the most important thing is health, and the most important thing for health is communication."

Mr. Paganini cited Mr. Federer's withdrawal from the grass court event in Germany last week as an example. Mr. Federer said he was disappointed to have to skip it. "I had all little niggling injuries," he said. "It would have been a huge, massive risk for me to go play there and then go and play Wimbledon."

Mr. Paganini is just one member of Team Federer. One of Mr. Federer's closest friends, Swiss Davis Cup captain Severin Luthi, has served as a coach for several years now. Stephane Vivier, a former physiotherapist for the men's tour, has been Mr. Federer's private therapist since the fall of 2009, and handles Mr. Federer's aches and pains. Paul Annacone, the former coach of Pete Sampras, is the most recent addition to the group. He began coaching Mr. Federer last summer and has been instrumental in helping Mr. Federer modify his tactics and begin to volley with more frequency, as he did in his earlier years.

Mr. Annacone knows much about the weight of expectations for a champion in an individual sport like tennis. Victories become coronations, proof of one's greatness; losses are taken as signs of an imminent, and probably gruesome, demise. Though Mr. Sampras won 14 major singles titles, he didn't play with the pressure of Mr. Federer. He wasn't given much chance to win on clay, and on hard courts he had many capable rivals. Since Mr. Federer won his first Wimbledon in 2003, he has been expected to win nearly every match he has played on every surface. His record since January 2004, the year he became No. 1: 541 wins and 72 losses, a winning percentage of 88.3%.

"Pete was very emotionally tired—he wasn't physically tired, he was emotionally tired at the end of his career," Mr. Annacone said. "Roger still has the energy of a 23-year-old. He's relentlessly optimistic."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303714704576385793528219736.html?mod=WSJ_article_TennisHeadlines

• 
  
  

How We Like It - A Blast From The Past

Since Roger's going to be playing on grass for the first time this year, I think the video above is a great way to look forward to it. What's not to like? Probably my favourite online tennis video, it features the great Rod Laver playing against Tony Roche, former coach of Roger Federer, at the 1969 Australian Open semi-final.


I understand that given the kind of tennis we see today, the short points and the lack of baseline rallies might initially be difficult to appreciate, but eventually, it isn't too hard to see the genius. Tony Roche's split-step and backhand volley are probably the most graceful in the history of the game, and Laver's all-court game is simply a marvel to watch. Add to that the fact that Roche hits one of the best lobs I've ever seen in this match, and you've got a video with great repeat value, and a must see for fans of the all-court and transition game.


Enjoy. Looking forward to the Wimbledon 2011 draw.

In the beginning...

When Roger Federer beat Pete Sampras, my boyhood idol, at Wimbledon 2001, I was too blind to realise how good he was. I missed it all, the great movement, the championship mentality, the big match composure, because it hurt too much to see Sampras go down.

Today it happens to be my favourite tennis match of all time.

I eventually saw why he was so special. It took some time. Many Federer fans describe a singular moment or match that they went from interested tennis fans to Federer maniacs. He has that effect on people, something I do admit to myself now that Pete never had. For me that moment was Wimbledon 2003, the first time I felt I'd seen a truly complete player. In Pete I looked for perfection in every serve, in every volley, and mimicked it through my junior days. Even today my own game has a lot of Sampras in it simply from attempting to hit the ball like him or trying to serve like him. In Pete, I always saw perfection. I saw something to aspire to. I still do. 

With Roger, however, it's a quality that I just can't put my finger on. 

When Federer won in New York in '08 when everyone counted him out, I knew for the first time that he was my favourite player ever. My worship of Pete was respectful. My worship of Federer is adoring. Very few Sampras fans ever came to terms with Federer's assault on his records, but I did. Happily. The Swiss' records are being challenged now. And they'll be challenged until they're broken, but somehow, I don't think I'll ever feel about his retirement the way I felt about Sampras'. Back then, all that mattered to me was that Pete could beat anyone at his best. When it comes time for Federer to walk away, that thought will never cross my mind. I will never wonder whether he was the best, at his best. His wins and losses would matter little to me in that final analysis. I'll simply know that when he lost, he lost better than anyone else. I'll simply know that I don't need a textbook to point me towards the perfect stroke.

Aspirations be damned. I'll simply know that tennis should be played the way Federer played it.