Pages

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The Way Things Stand...

Neither WCR nor I saw the Federer-Youzhny match in its entirety, due to generally poor coverage, and also because the Del Potro-Nadal match had us glued and both were going on at the same time.

From what I've seen, Del Potro played an outstanding match for somebody finally coming to terms with this surface, and seems to be enjoying coming forward more and more. He played well throughout, came in plenty, and as a result took Nadal to two breakers and stole a set from him as well. Seeing him evolve on this surface has been great.

He still has a lot to learn about grass, and a lot of that will have to do with hitting even better volleys behind such an amazing serve, though he did it better than most expected, and he will need to stand farther inside the court. Too many times Nadal had the opportunity to come in and sting him with drop volleys, seeing Del Potro miles behind the baseline.

Despite these issues, Del Potro and his fans should be very happy with the way he played, and he looks set mentally to win the US Open.

Nadal is by far the best player in the tournament right now, and it's not really close. Despite Del Potro being on his game for most of the match, he retrieved as only he can, and came in plenty. His statistics in this match were astonishing considering the calibre of player he faced. It's clear. Nadal wakes up differently for Wimbledon now, perhaps even more focused than his beloved French. He's serving bombs and his cross-court backhand is at its best. Quite frankly, he is playing the best I've seen him play on grass since Wimbledon 2008.

So what can his opponents do? They can still beat him. But it will take someone really taking it to him aggressively, like Del Potro did, and more clinically, to defeat him. Considering the draw that lies before us now, it's hard to see who can do this. Murray is not playing consistently good tennis, even considering his sound beating of Gasquet. He has ups and downs, and it is a fact that he simply does not know how to play a naturally attacking game on his own steam (which means that he can do it to mix things up but, but it's not his game in general). Novak is playing well, but his tennis here has been no different from his clay game earlier this year, minus the sliding. He still relies too heavily on keeping the ball in play, and as well as he does it, it seems that he is becoming less and less attacking. It does seem to be the sort of tennis that troubles Nadal, but on grass, Nadal changes things. His forehand is much flatter and he approaches with gusto, and Djokovic will probably not be able to deal with that over five sets.

Tsonga is the only player left in the draw with the right approach to grass court tennis, but I highly doubt he can do it for three whole sets against a Nadal of this calibre.

Which brings us to Roger Federer. Off the ground, Roger has been flawless. From what I saw even of the Youzhny match, he was never in trouble, and knew it. Youzhny was playing out of his skin, but to do that on grass for three sets against Federer is a tall ask. Roger played well to come back, never really looking like he was beating beaten; simply delayed.

Now, Roger's baseline game is so good that he can beat anyone off the ground here, except Nadal. If he should reach a final against Nadal here, and tries to go toe to toe with him from the back, he will lose. And badly, because of the nature of the match-up which doesn't need to be rehashed here. As Del Potro showed, the only way to get close to Nadal is to really go after him, and despite doing most things correctly, it didn't happen for him. This means Roger needs to play as aggressively as Del Potro did, but needs to be even more clinical at net, and will need to spend a lot less time at the baseline than him as well, since while DP is not troubled by Nadal's high topspin forehand to his backhand, Roger cannot handle that in a best-of-five match.

Roger is not going to beat Nadal off the ground, so he will need to come in literally on 30-40% of all points to stand a chance. This isn't hard to do, but can Roger execute once at net? How many sitters will he miss? How many shoe-lace volleys can he put in play. How much will his wrist drop? Will he approach at the right times and on the right shots? Will he use the slice as an approach?

From what I've seen, Roger hasn't done enough of any of this so far at this tournament for me to be convinced that he can do it in his next match or after. Maybe he can, but right now, I haven't seen the signs. He came in a good deal in his last two sets against Youzhny, which is good, but still didn't look entirely authoritative. And it does make me wonder whether he is a hundred percent physically when he doesn't try things out, since it seems that the obvious thing to do at Wimbledon is come in during the early rounds. I have no doubt that Paul would have stressed on this, but for some reason Roger has not been able to follow through. I just hope the reason isn't physical.

All this does seem rather grim. And maybe even a bit premature. But it is important to cover all the bases and look at the overall picture. His next match is against Tsonga, who is on a roll, and who will steal the net from Roger a good deal. Roger might very well be able to defeat him by passing him from the back court. The smart thing to do, however, will be to take Tsonga out of his comfort zone and come in and take over the net at least on serve. A good mix is what will be needed against Tsonga, but if he gets through that, his potential semi final and final will need to be mostly about approaching well.

We are now in the second week of Wimbledon and this is where it all really starts. Rust should have been scraped off by now. Weapons and tools should have been sharpened. It is an old tennis saying that, "You can't win a major in the first week." So now, it's time to bring it.

17 comments:

  1. That's a good analysis of tennis: how do you suggest Roger overcome all the CHEATING?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know if coming to the net that much is a solution against Nadal.I mean del Potro was passed a tons of times by Nadal's BH and it's useless to approach on his FH because it's almost sure he's going to pass you.He's by far the best passer in the game and it's difficult to make points at the net against him..

    ReplyDelete
  3. RICKYROGER, I note your comments re: Roger's chances in this superb analysis. I'd like to say "thanks" but can't!! :) My heart just sinks. Rather pathetically, I think "anyone but RN" and here you have effectively defined his win!!
    I hope to God that you are somehow wrong in your analysis, but I suspect you're at the net and ready to put away any baseline effort I may make in this regard!

    ReplyDelete
  4. ANDREI

    I've made this point a lot of times before. Nobody is going to beat Nadal from the baseline. I repeat, NOBODY. So by plain logic, you have to come in. Would you rather lose to someone playing his game or playing your game?

    Secondly, Del Potro's results on grass have been mediocre until this year, when he tried to come in. He made a conscious effort to come forward against Nadal. It's when people say that it won't work because he gets passed a hundred times that I realise that someone has not really watched serve and volley tennis in the 80s and early 90s enough. Sampras got passed by Agassi more than Nadal passed Del Potro today, and came forward a lot more than him as well. In serve and volley tennis, you don't expect not to get passed. You use it to impose yourself, and getting passed is simply a side-effect.

    The way you should be thinking is like this: would Del Potro have taken it to two TBs and won a set if he HAD NOT come in? The answer is a resounding NO to anyone that watched the entirety of that match.

    What does that tell us? That Del Potro approached a lot, but needed to approach even better. He is not yet a full fledged net player, but is getting there. McEnroe was an amazing net player when he faced Borg. Sampras was an amazing net player when he faced Agassi. Edberg was an outstanding net player against any baseliner. It might be more difficult to approach now than those days, but none of the Del Potros or Federers volley anywhere near as well as those guys to even say they tried it and couldn't do it.

    If the net is not the one place to beat Rafa, should they rally with him from the baseline? Can they expect anything from that? No chance. Rafa has not faced an excellent all court player yet, in complete form.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SAM

    Nothing would make me happier than to be proved wrong in this regard. And I'm sorry if my analysis is hard to take. Really, I want the best for Federer, but I'm not sure he's a 100%. It might be for physical reasons that he hasn't moved forward. It might simply be that he thinks he's good enough off the ground to beat Nadal. It's the latter that I'm afraid off. If he has a niggle then that happens. Better luck next time. I just don't want this to be about not having worked hard enough in the early rounds on his net game, something I was sure would affect him as he stormed through the early rounds of 2008 when everyone thought he was fine. I do not not want to see that happen again.

    Let's hope he wakes up for this match against Tsonga. Tsonga will try to get to net as much as possible, which means Roger should try and prove he is the better volleyer. He is as good anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ok, I understand your point now, RR.

    Regarding the match with Tsonga, I think Roger should do on Tsonga's serve what you suggested him to do on Nadal's serve : to go for it.Because I don't think Roger will have too much trouble on his own serve and I saw parts of his game with Youzhny and his return was really up and down.I don't want Roger just to get it to a tiebreak, I want him to try to break and return aggresivly.

    I still have in mind that comment Hewitt made at Wimbledon 08', that you can stay calm on your second serve because you know Roger is not gonna hurt you.I'm affraid that's what I've seen most of the time against Youzhny and he should practice his more aggresive returns before a potential match with Nadal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great point on the Federer return. I've always said he should go the Sampras route and just go for his shots on the return. I think this is key against Nadal as well.

    What makes it difficult against Nadal is that he has to do all the thinking. He has to remember now to hit too many BHs crosscourt, he has to remember that the slice is better hit down the line, he has to remember not to approach on topspin FHs,that he should approach on BH slices, that he should (as you rightly pointed out) go for his returns etc. On top of that he has to execute perfectly.

    What does Nadal have to do? Hit to Roger's BH. Game Set Match if Roger doesn't do all of the above.

    Rough.

    I hope Roger does what you've suggested here and goes for his returns against Tsonga. On serve, even when it is at a low % he isn't getting broken much. He is now in the QFs and has only been broken twice. So the return will be key.

    Thanks for your comment. Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  8. God knows I feed on this blog and maybe press F5 a thousand time a day to see updates. And now I am officially falling off a cliff. XD I think I just took a bitter pill. XD If there is reading misery index I will rate this article 100%. OK, enough of the mumbling. LOL Regarding the physical problem might prevent him from moving forward, then what is the problem? He is moving left and right pretty well. Now they are playing third set and Rog only went forward 19% (29/146), so I guess he stands no chance...orz

    ReplyDelete
  9. I meant with this percentage of net approach he stands no chance if he meets Nadal......orz

    ReplyDelete
  10. Moving left and right is entirely different and involve very different areas of the body as compared to bending low and coming in. He moved in four times in the fourth. That makes no sense to me whatsoever especially after his baseline game was not working against the barrage from Jo. I can;t see why he didn't get more aggressive and charge. He also under-utilised the slice against such a big man.

    He's seemed very foggy. Typically happens when something hurts. Not saying it's definite, but I definitely can't see any other reason considering how much he was willing to do things differently on a surface as slow as clay.

    ReplyDelete
  11. RR

    i am more inclined to think there is something bothering him. his movement on the baseline is OK. but he was mightily struggling to move to his right esp on the FH side; throughout this tournament he did not bend enough on the BH side and to compensate it he used his sprinting/athleticisim; to me it was a virtual reality as if he had tons of time to hit a BH but honestly i think it is just that he covered so much ground to look that way. some injury apart from the blisters (on his hand i guess) which we will never know until the man decides to tell us.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks Anonymous for your thoughts on his movement.

    Just out of curiosity, do we already know you, or would you like to remain anonymous? :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. hey RR

    i tried to sign-off with my name. yes you know me very well

    -Mangai

    ReplyDelete
  14. just like Roger, i am brain cramped too; i tried to say that i was trying to sign-off my last post with my name but hit the post comment.

    too much of brain cramping today.

    mangai

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's really sad that Roger worked so hard over the past year to get his game in shape to target Wimbledon. And instead, that game deserts him when he needs it most, at his most beloved tournament. Given the exertions of the clay season and the effort he put in at the FO, his withdrawal from Halle citing a specific injury, and subsequent comments that he had some pain, have convinced me that Roger was not 100% physically. This is not to take away anything from Tsonga, who played magnificently and deserved a win. Roger has always said that if you step on court, you're fit to play. And I abide by that edict. Nonetheless, I cannot see the Roger of 16 Slams and 6 Wimbledons lose at the quarterfinals of a major in the manner that he did today. I would have expected more fire, more passion, more fight. Instead, it seemed he was enveloped in a cloak of resignation, going through the motions and having no expectations oF winning. Pity.

    After that blistering match against Novak at the French, I had such high, high hopes for Roger at Wimbledon, and I really feel for him.

    Onwards and upwards, I guess. And I'll take anyone winning this tournament but Nadal. But, I hope for Tsonga, not only because of his great performance today, but because of the kind of game that he plays, that really ought to find its just rewards on grass.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "I have no doubt that Paul would have stressed on this, but for some reason Roger has not been able to follow through."

    How do you know what PA stressed? If I remember correctly, Roger came to the net very often earlier part of the year. For all we know, PA could be stressing the opposite of what you say. One sports commentator said that he saw no difference in Roger's play even with PA.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No one can know for sure what Annacone stressed; I was merely emphasizing what I believe to be true. We can only assume based on his coaching and playing history.

    I know a number of commentators say a number of different things. In my view there has been plenty that has been different about Roger's game since Annacone came on board. This is an opinion piece. We call it like WE see it.

    I also have some idea as to what Annacone stressed because I've watched him during his career, through every major he helped Pete Sampras win, and through Tim Henman's excellent year with him.

    When Pete Sampras refused to come in against grinders and would lose, he would repeatedly tell Pete, "You looked real good... losing." He's always been interested in helping his player finish points quickly since the players he coaches have strengths geared towards aggression.

    Nobody knows for sure. This isn't a news article. We just try to talk things out based on our tennis knowledge.

    Thanks for your comment.

    ReplyDelete